Sensapure Flavors
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Facilities
    • Meet the Team
    • Careers
  • Services
    • Product Development
    • Our Services
    • Project Request
    • Mobile Flavor Lab
    • Partnering Program
    • Natural Flavors
    • Sensapure Academy
    • Tasting App
    • Flavor Technologies
    • Dyad Labs Partnership
    • Turnkey Beverage Kits
  • Flavors
    • Flavor Samples
    • Request Sample
    • Flavor Fans
    • 2023 Flavor Trends
  • News
    • News
    • Events
    • All Posts
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • About
  • Services
  • Flavors
  • News
    • News
    • Events
    • All Posts
  • Resources
  • Contact
    • Request Samples
    • Contact
      • New Sample Request

Chemicals- Smell, Taste, Structure

June 11, 2020 By Scott Rackham

Chemicals- Smell, Taste, Structure

There are Chemicals in everything we eat. All foods are made up of chemicals, whether they occur in nature or are made in a lab. That means everything we smell or taste is a response to chemicals.

Cinnamon is a spice that is used in both sweet and savory foods.

For example, the characteristic smell of cloves, comes from one chemical called eugenol. Cinnamon, which is just the dried inner-bark of specific trees, gets its aroma and flavor from the compound cinnamic aldehyde. In nature, vanillin comes from an orchid. The process of extracting this pure, natural chemical is extremely lengthy and expensive. The compound vanillin is responsible for the flavor and smell of vanilla. So scientists found a way to make a synthetic version of vanilla in a lab.

Both artificial and natural flavors contain chemicals

If both artificial and natural flavors contain chemicals, what’s the difference? The distinction between natural and artificial flavors is the source of chemicals. Natural flavors are created from anything that can be eaten.

According to the FDA, “Natural flavor is the essential oil, oleoresin, essence or extractive, protein hydrolysate, distillate, or any product of roasting, heating or enzymolysis, which contains the flavoring constituents derived from a spice, fruit or fruit juice, vegetable or vegetable juice, edible yeast, herb, bark, bud, root, leaf or similar plant material, meat, seafood, poultry, eggs, dairy products, or fermentation products thereof, whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”

Artificial flavors come from anything that is inedible. For example, from petroleum that is processed to create chemicals of flavorings. For the FDA, the definition of an artificial flavor is any substance that does not meet the definition of a natural flavor

Artificial vs. Natural

Most times a chemical flavoring can be made from either natural or artificial sources — the resulting molecule is the same, but the route to making is different. So which are “safer” or “better” for you, artificial or natural flavors? The answer is probably not what you think.

Since the chemicals for natural flavors are derived from organic sources, they can carry a higher risk of contamination. It’s not that it is slowing down interest in natural flavors, it’s just the opposite. Demand for natural flavors in expected to continue to grow.

So if the demand for natural flavors is increasing, why use artificial flavors at all? Synthetic chemicals that make up artificial flavors generally cost less to produce than finding and extracting the chemicals from natural sources.

Contact our flavor chemists to get started with your flavor today.

Download a copy of our chemical presentation here

Filed Under: Flavor Science & Research, Uncategorized

Bioavailability of CBD Greatly Increased with ANANDA Scientific’s Nano-Enhanced CBD

May 18, 2020 By Scott Rackham

Bioavailability of CBD Greatly Increased with ANANDA Scientific’s Nano-Enhanced CBD

Cannabidiol (CBD) from industrial hemp is a multi-functional molecule, and the bioavailability of CBD is greatly increased because of ANANDA.
Scientific studies indicated that it may be a more powerful antioxidant than either Vitamin C or E, and CBD offers the prospect of successfully fighting chronic inflammation and protecting brain cells from reactive oxygen species (1-2).

CBD’s beneficial potential is discussed in numerous published papers. Further, it has promise in stabilizing and even reducing blood sugar levels; as a pain killer; for reducing the risk of artery blockage; in suppressing muscle spasms, seizures, and convulsions; for fighting varied cancers; and more (3-8).

Such promise is accompanied by a major limitation to its usefulness — low bioavailability. Because of this, any beneficial effects from CBD become patchy or erratic due to problems in getting CBD into the body in adequate amounts (9-14).

For a supplement taken by mouth, bioavailability means the proportion of a dose that enters the bloodstream from the small intestine (15-17). Therefore, once in the blood, the supplement can find its way to the target organ or body system, where it then goes to work in supporting health and wellness.

On average, only 5-6% of almost any CBD preparation gets into the bloodstream. As a result, the rest is wasted. Such poor oral bioavailability guarantees variable or unpredictable effects, along with increased costs from having to take larger doses to compensate.

Appropriate formulation strategies that assist in getting into the bloodstream are thus mandatory for CBD to attain its health-giving potential, as well as in a cost-efficient or economical fashion.

ANANDA Scientific’s research & development has yielded a patented CBD technology using GRAS ingredients that resolve CBD’s bioavailability problem. This patented technology is the first of its kind. “GRAS” means that a substance is Generally Recognized As Safe by the US Food and Drug Administration to be used in foods and beverages (18).

Comparison of bioavailability of CBD

Figure 1. ANANDA Scientific’s patented, proprietary technology (nextCBD) involves highly-ordered constructs made from GRAS compounds into which CBD is affixed. Therefore, this technology makes nextCBD very bioavailable when taken by mouth.

Purpose.

This study compares the bioavailability of CBD and ANANDA Scientific’s enhanced CBD in laboratory rats. The bioavailability of substances taken by mouth are comparable between rats and humans (19-28).

Methods.

This demonstration looks at the plasma contents of cannabidiol (CBD) after a single oral dose administered by gavage (through a tube leading down the throat to the stomach; 29) of regular CBD and ANANDA Scientific’s enhanced CBD over a 24-hour period.

In this example, female Sprague-Dawley rats (240-265 gm body weight) were used. The study design and animal usage were reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) for compliance with regulations prior to study initiation. Animal welfare for this study with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal Welfare Act (9 CFR Parts 1, 2, and 3) and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (30).

A 50-mg CBD/kg body weight model was examined in animals given ANANDA Scientific’s nano-enhanced pure CBD and a control group for which powdered pure CBD in the same amount was fed. Ten animals were in each group.

Blood samples were taken immediately prior to gavage as well as 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0 and 24.0 hours after dosing. Venous blood was collected in an EDTA blood collection tube. Next, plasma was separated from red blood cells by centrifugation at 400 g for 15 min., transferred to a fresh microcentrifuge tube, and stored at −80°C.

CBD was quantified using validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS-MS) in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode.

Findings.

The results verify that ANANDA’s enhanced methods greatly improves bioavailability of CBD. It was significantly more bioavailable than regular CBD at 0.5 and 2 hours.

As a result, far lower dosing is needed for enhanced CBD versus regular CBD. The results also intimate that products containing the regular, non-enhanced CBD found in most products may suffer from low bioavailability and a consequent ineffectiveness.

Study of the bioavailibility of CBD over time

Contact us today to get started with all your CBD needs.

References

1. Burstein, S. 2015. Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: a review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 23(7):1377-1385.

2. Couch, D.G., H. Maudslay, B. Doleman, J.N. Lund, and S.E. O’Sullivan. 2018. The use of cannabinoids in colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflammatory Bowel Disease 24(4):680-697.

3. Campos, A.C., M.V. Fogaça, A.B. Sonego, and F.S. Guimarães. 2016. Cannabidiol, neuroprotection and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacological Research 112:119-127.


4. Mannucci, C., M. Navarra, F. Calapai, E.V. Spagnolo, F.P. Busardò, R.D. Cas, F.M. Ippolito, G. Calapai. 2008. Neurological aspects of medical use of cannabidiol. CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug Targets 16(5):541-553.

5. McAllister, S.D., L. Soroceanu, and P.Y. Desprez. 2015. The antitumor activity of plant-derived non-psychoactive cannabinoids. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology 10(2):255-267.

6. Pisanti, S., A.M. Malfitan, E. Ciaglia, A. Lamberti, R. Ranieri, G. Cuomo, M. Abate, G. Faggiana, M.C. Proto, D. Fiore, C. Laezza, and M. Bifulco. 2017. Cannabidiol: state of the art and new challenges for therapeutic applications. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 175:133-150.

7. Robson, P.J. . 2014. Therapeutic potential of cannabinoid medicines. Drug Testing and Analysis 6(1-2):24-30.

8. Russo, E.B. 2008. Cannabinoids in the management of difficult to treat pain. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 4(1):245-259.

9. Agurell, S., S. Carlsson, J.E. Lindgren, A. Ohlsson, H. Gillspie, L. Hollister. 1981. Interaction of THC with cannabinol and cannabidiol following oral administration in man. Assay of cannabinol and cannabidiol by mass fragmentography. Experientia 37:1090–1092.

10. Gaston, T.E., and D. Friedman. Pharmacology of cannabinoids in the treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior 70(Pt. B):313-318.

11. , F. 2003. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 42(4):327-360.

12. McGilveray, I.J. 2005. Pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids. Pain Research and Management 10(Suppl. A):15A-22A.

13. Ohisson, A., J.E. Lindgren, S. Andersson, S. Agurell, H. Gillespie, L.E. Hollister. 1986. Single-dose kinetics of deuterium-labeled cannabidiol in man after smoking and intravenous administration. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrometry 13:77–83.

14. Samara, E., M. Bialer, R. Mechoulam. 1988. Pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol in dogs. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 16:469–472.

15. Bhattaram, V.A., U. Graefe, C. Kohlert, and H. Derendorf. 2002. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of herbal medicinal products. Phytomedicine 9 (Suppl 3):1-33.

16. El-Kattan, A.F. 2017. Oral Bioavailability Assessment: Basics and Strategies for Drug Discovery and Development (Wiley Series on Pharmaceutical Science and Biotechnology: Practices, Applications and Methods). First Edition. Wiley, New York, 448 p.

17. Hu, M., and X. Li. 2011. Oral Bioavailability: Basic Principles, Advanced Concepts, and Applications. First Edition. Wiley, New York, 568 p. 18. GRAS Substances (SCOGS) Database. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GRAS/SCOGS

19. Akonur, A.I., C.J. Holmes, and J.k. Leypoldt. 2014. Predicting the peritoneal absorption of icodextrin in rats and humans including the effect of β-amylase activity in dialysate. Peritoneal Dialysis International 35(3)288-296.

20. Fagerholm, U., M. Johansson, and H. Lennernäs. 1996. Comparison Between Permeability Coefficients in Rat and Human Jejunum. Pharmaceutical Research 13(9):1336-1342.

21. Lawless E., B.T. Griffin B, A. O’Mahony A, and C.M. O’Driscoll. 2015. Exploring the impact of drug properties on the extent of intestinal lymphatic transport – in vitro and in vivo studies. Pharmaceutical Research 32(50:1817-1829.

22. Nagahara, N., Y. Akiyama, K. Higaki, and T. Kimura. 2006. Animal models for predicting potency of oral sustained-release adhesive microspheres in humans. International Journal of Pharmacy 331(1):46-53.

23. Pang, K.S. 2003. Modeling of intestinal drug absorption: roles of transporters and metabolic enzymes. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 31(12):1509-1517.

24. Salphati, L., K. Childers, L. Pan, K. Tsutsui, and L. Takahashi. 2001. Evaluation of a single-pass intestinal-perfusion method in rat for the prediction of absorption in man. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 53(7):1007-1013.

25. Stewart, B,H., O.H. Chan, R.H. Lu, E.L. Reyner, H.L. Schmid, H.W. Hamilton, B.A. Steinbaugh, and M.D. Taylor. 1995. Comparison of intestinal permeabilities determined in multiple in vitro and in situ models: relationship to absorption in humans. Pharmaceutical Research 12(5):693-699.

26. Zenghui Teng , Z., C. Yuan , F. Zhang, M. Huan, W. Cao, K. Li, J. Yang, D. Cao, S. Zhou, and Q. Mei. 2012. Intestinal absorption and first-pass metabolism of polyphenol compounds in rat and their transport dynamics in Caco-2 cells. PLoS One 7(1):e29647.

27. Zakeri-Milania,P., H. Valizadeha, H. Tajerzadehc, Y. Azarmia, Z. Islambolchilara, S. Barzegara, and M. Barzegar-Jalalia. 2007. Predicting human intestinal permeability using single-pass intestinal perfusion in rats. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 10(3):368-379.

28. Zhang, D., and L._X. Gang. 2012. Preclinical experimental models of drug metabolism and disposition in drug discovery and development. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2(6):549-561.

29. Andrews, K., and S. McErla. 2012. Oral dosing (gavage) in adult mice and rats. University of British Columbia Animal Care Guidelines, Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) ACC-2012-Tech09.

30. National Research Council and Division on Earth and Life Studies. 2011. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Eighth Edition. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 246 p.

Filed Under: Flavor Science & Research Tagged With: cbd, flavor education, flavor manufacturing, flavor profiles, new flavors, research, supplement, technology

Challenges and Solutions to Flavoring CBD Products

May 18, 2020 By Scott Rackham

Challenges and Solutions to Flavoring CBD Products

During the last few years, there’s been challenges in getting CBD products into marketing, and more importantly, good flavoring of CBD. In 2018, most CBD products were tinctures, vapes, softgels or capsules, gummies, dog chews, equine pellets, or in the skincare and cosmetics form.

Back in September 2019, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) moved to insert language into a congressional spending report that calls on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to clear a path for the lawful marketing of hemp-derived CBD products.

In draft language shared by the U.S. Hemp Roundtable on Tuesday, the senator is asking FDA to “issue a policy of enforcement discretion with regard to certain products containing CBD” within 120 days. Industry stakeholders say this will clarify rules so that banks are more willing to service CBD companies.

Oil versus powder flavoring CBD

Hydrophobic vs. Oil-based Products

Starting out, all CBD products were hydrophobic/oil-based products. CBD was initially available in two main forms- curde or purified oil extract, or oil soluble powder. These oil-based products were the easiest to make, and required the least amount of effort.  All of the previous applications for CBS were the path of least resistance. With the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, there was a flood of companies looking to be the first to market. The target audience for CBD products were all true CBD believers. Taste was less important than the medicinal properties of it.

As we move into the next generation of CBD products, we’re seeing more variety in the forms that CBD is offered in such as isolate, powdered, crystal, oil, and more. This variety in forms allows greater control over potency and purity. We’re moving from purely “Medicinal” products to more “Lifestyle” product categories. Some new lifestyle products we’re seeing are RTD Beverages, Shots, Infusions, Sleep Aides, Teas, and Lotions. We’re also seeing food products like mints, candies, gum, and chews.

Flavoring CBD graphEarly adopters with flavoring CBDWater Soluble CBD

Unlike the first generation of oil-based products, new water soluble CBD helps reduce stability problems and increases bioavailability. More refined CBD means less variation in consistency. A lower potency with water soluble products makes it easier to flavor these products.

Growing the category from just the “True Believers” and “Innovators” to begin to serve the “Early Adopters” requires a shift in product development. However, there’s a few hurdles in order to move past that initial 2.5% of the market. Kristen Nichols, from MJBiz Magazine, said, “There’s more to crafting a winning CBD beverage than figuring out how to get the cannabinoid into liquid, though. The bigger challenge is making a beverage people want to drink. Consumers want a tasty beverage that competes against fruit juices or heavily sweetened energy drinks, not something that tastes like medicine.”

Guide to terpines and flavoring CBD

Terpenes

This is where terpenes enter the picture. Terpenes are aromatic oils found in many plants. These  include cannabis varieties that can have distinctive flavors like citrus, berry, mint, piney, nutty, grassy and bitter. Over 100 different terpenes have been identified in the cannabis plant, and every strain tends toward a unique terpene type and composition. There are many factors that influence the taste profile of cannabinoids, including climate, weather, age and maturation, fertilizers, and soil type. Luckily, terpenes can be removed from CBD, but it’s easier to work with them than against them. For example, caryophyllene has a spicy, woody, pepper aroma. Some sample flavors that work with peppery terpenes are peppermint candy, mango chili pepper, cinnamon clove, and hot tamale.

When working with flavors and CBD, formulation will be specific to the strain, source, and delivery method. What you are tasting in CBD products… isn’t pure CBD. It’s the associated terpenes, compounds, chemicals and carriers of that particular ingredient source. As production and processing of CBD improves, the flavor profiles of the CBD of tomorrow won’t be the same as the CBD of today.

Flavoring CBD is important to create a good product

If you have unwanted taste in your CBD, an effective way to block unwanted taste attribute is to confuse the tongue with both different and like sensations. Bitter blockers can be sweet, sour, salt, bitter, or umami. Stevia and monk fruit or malic acic can also mask the taste. It’s important to consider the concentration of your CBD. Flavoring a 10% CBD solution is 90% easier than flavoring an 80% CBD solution. In order to flavor a solution, you must consider dilutions, carriers, delivery method, and emulsions. You must also consider water soluble ingredients that you choose to add to your CBD.

In Conclusion

There’s lots of aspects that go into making a good CBD product. With so many changes happening in the industry, Sensapure can be a great resource to help perfect your product. Send your approved CBD ingredient to our flavor lab to use as the source of your CBD product. Its use in a base product can make a significant difference in determining the best flavor solution. Give us a call to schedule a consult today.

Filed Under: Flavor Science & Research Tagged With: cbd, flavor chemist, flavor combinations, flavor education, flavor manufacturing, flavor profiles, lifestyle, marketing, medicinal, oil

Becoming a Flavor Chemist

April 4, 2019 By Sensapure

Becoming a Flavor Chemist

It’s no secret that flavor chemistry is an invaluable art to the food and nutraceuticals industry. But few understand the complex formula to officially becoming a flavor chemist in today’s ever-changing professional climate. It requires a level of dedication and expertise even more specific and exclusive than that of a rocket scientist.

Flavor Taste Testing

Value of a Virtuoso Flavor Chemist

According to the Society Of Flavor Chemists’ records, the first meetings were held in 1959 NYC in Little Italy’s restaurants. When the professional society was first created, there were only 14 recorded members. Today, there are only a few hundred in the entire US. Needless to say, becoming a flavor chemist is a commitment of time and passion in which few follow through.

Although almost everyone has tasted a product created by a flavor chemist, few interact with one on a personal basis. “You have to really want to be a flavor chemist to be a flavor chemist,” joked Mariano Gascon. He’s one of Sensapure’s Flavors flavor chemists, and he isn’t kidding. Becoming a flavor chemist doesn’t require education beyond a bachelor’s degree in food science, chemistry, or related disciplines. But it does require an extensive amount of training and testing.

A seven-year apprenticeship period approved by the Society Of Flavor Chemists is just the beginning of the journey. Once candidates pass their post apprenticeship review, they must complete an additional approved five-year apprenticeship.

Flavor chemists approved by the society are rare and in high in demand throughout the industry. This is because the robust program is completed by so few. Flavor houses that employ flavor chemists stand out against the rest for two main reasons. The competitive nature of recruiting them is one reason, as well as the difficulty of keeping them. The value they bring, however, is incomparable.

The Chemistry of Consumer Loyalty

While the food industry has evolved dramatically over the past 50 years, flavor chemists have remained a critical aspect in bridging the gap between food manufacturers and the desires of a consumer. By providing an intimate understanding of the relationship an individual has with a product from the moment they first encounter it to the very last taste, flavor chemists are critical in maintaining consumer loyalty. However, that’s not to say that the flavor industry hasn’t evolved with the technology that replaced human production lines with machine ones.

In fact, due to new and improved instrumentation such as computers, liquid chromatography, and updates in profiling technology, flavor chemists have been able to accelerate their abilities to improve products and formulas in order to achieve better, more cost-effective and attainable solutions for both food manufacturers and consumers alike.

Bright Beverage

Flavor Industry Evolution

Evolution in the flavor industry doesn’t stop there. As the media continues to advance the pace of trend reach and demand for what’s current, the role of a flavor chemist is extending far beyond chemistry and insight. While becoming a flavor chemist requires a specific set of skills and accreditations, it also requires something less tangible; creativity.

Gascon says that flavor chemists call themselves “artists,” for a reason. In his journey to become a flavor chemist, he also attended culinary school. Gascon says that qualitative aspects of becoming a chef are similar to becoming a flavor chemist, “Chefs and flavor chemists interpret things differently,” he said, “but they both contain the essence of creativity.”

Although Gascon practices his creativity both in the lab and in the kitchen, he believes that the most important aspect of becoming a flavor chemist is gaining the competency to precisely identify with the consumer. “When I’m writing a formula I think about what the consumer is tasting in the beginning middle and end,” he says.

This ability to instinctively curate a consumer’s individual experience with one flavor profile out of thousands of chemicals is just one of the things that set flavor chemists apart from the rest of the players in the industry.

Flavor Chemist

Standard of Excellence

Gascon says that while there is no ‘typical day’ in the life of a flavor chemist, there is certainly the common denominator of sensory mastery. Flavor chemist apprentices must be able to memorize and identify many hundreds of different chemicals — by smell — in order to pass the rigorous tests required; defining them as experts in all things organoleptic.

Their olfactory mastery and chemistry memorization skills continue to be a part of their careers on a daily basis. Flavor chemists don’t only need to know the chemicals well enough to make good flavors, but also to combine their properties into a blend that meets the specific needs of each client. When working with flavor chemists, clients experience a unique level of collaboration and artistry that they will surely never forget.

If you are interested in learning more about how flavor chemist expertise can enhance the value of your business, contact Sensapure Flavors for a consultation.

About Sensapure Flavors:

Sensapure Flavors is a flavor house that services the nutrition and supplement industry with exciting flavor technology and unmatched applications experience. Born in a manufacturing company that understands the ever-changing needs of the nutraceutical industry, Sensapure combines new flavor technologies with deep product application experience.

Contact Us Today!

Sensapure Flavors

1945 S. Fremont Drive

Salt Lake City, UT 84104

801-456-4284

Sensapure Flavors

Research and Technology Development

545 West Lambert Road, Bldg. D

Brea, CA. 92821

657-341-2200

 

Filed Under: 2019 News, Flavor Science & Research, Year Archives Tagged With: chemistry, consumer, employee, flavor chemist, flavor combinations, flavor education, flavor library, flavor system, industry, nutrition, product development, standard, supplement

1945 S. Fremont Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84104

Looking for something specific? Search our site.

© 2018 Sensapure Flavors, All Rights Reserved

(801) 456-4284
[email protected]

Copyright © 2023 · Minimum Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in